Court Dismisses Petitioner’s Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order Following Cross-Examination

100+ Trials

In a recent court case involving a Petitioner seeking a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) against their ex-spouse, the court made a decisive ruling to dismiss the request after a thorough cross-examination of the Petitioner.

The parties involved had finalized their divorce a year prior to the filing and granting of a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) in relation to the case.

The contentious legal battle stemmed from the ex-spouse’s alleged avoidance of the Petitioner due to a financial matter involving a loan that the parties had previously agreed upon. The ex-spouse’s failure to repay the loan led to strained relations between the parties, culminating in an unfortunate incident where the client’s stepson reportedly punched the client in the eye while the client was wearing glasses, resulting in injury.

Subsequently, the ex-spouse took legal action and filed for a TRO, which was initially granted by the court. However, during the cross-examination process, the court heard compelling testimony and evidence that led to the dismissal of the request for a DVRO with prejudice.

The ruling signifies a vital step in resolving the complex legal dispute between the parties and highlights the importance of a fair and thorough judicial process in cases involving allegations of domestic violence and restraining orders.

For further information and inquiries, please contact us at

I Can Help You Navigate

The Riverside California Criminal Justice System

The Trusted Advocate You Need By Your Side from Beginning to End